Texas A&M
Aggies · SEC
- GIE rank
- #68
- of 138 FBS
- Rating
- 1556
- 2026 Week 10
- Record
- 4-4
- 2026 season
- Proj record
- 5-7
- 12-game season
Head coach Mike Elko Year 3 with Texas A&M
Year-3 HCs (2015-2024) averaged -0.10 W vs. preseason expectation
Season projection
- Expected wins
- 5.4
- 1.4 more wins in 4 left
- Win range (90%)
- 4 to 7
- Final rank (90%)
- #69 (50–86)
- Make playoff
- 0%
- Win conference
- 0%
Path to glory
No remaining game changes Texas A&M's playoff odds. Make playoff 0%
Schedule
Full 2026 slate. Tap a row for the matchup breakdown.
| Week | Opponent | Result or win prob.Result or win probability |
|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 Sep 5 | vs Missouri State Conference USA | Win, 50-0 Final |
| Wk 2 Sep 12 | vs Arizona State Big 12 | Win, 48-20 Final |
| Wk 3 Sep 19 | vs Kentucky SEC | Loss, 21-31 Final |
| Wk 4 Sep 26 | at LSU SEC | Loss, 6-35 Final |
| Wk 5 Oct 3 | vs Arkansas SEC | Win, 34-7 Final |
| Wk 6 Oct 10 | at Missouri SEC | Loss, 6-27 Final |
| Wk 7 Oct 17 | vs The Citadel Non-FBS | Win, 41-0 Final |
| Wk 8 Oct 24 | at Alabama SEC | Loss, 20-31 Final |
| Wk 9 | Bye | |
| Wk 10 Nov 7 | at South Carolina SEC | |
| Wk 11 Nov 14 | vs Tennessee SEC | |
| Wk 12 Nov 21 | at Oklahoma SEC | |
| Wk 13 Nov 28 | vs Texas SEC | |
In the news
- Texas A&M commits high school football recap: Oct. 8-10 results, stats (opens in a new tab)
- Nebraska visit opens eyes of Texas A&M Edge commitment Chance Archangel (opens in a new tab)
- 12 things Texas A&M football needs to fix to become bowl eligible this season (opens in a new tab)
- 3 Overreactions After Texas A&M's Loss to Missouri (opens in a new tab)
- Another Blow For Mike Elko: Aggies Lose Key OL Amid SEC Collapse (opens in a new tab) Texas A&M (GIE shift -18.0): Loss of Blake Ivy removes experienced depth from an offensive line already managing multiple absences. Ivy's absence reduces interior line flexibility and forces promotion of younger reserves into significant roles. Texas A&M's run-game efficiency and pocket integrity depend on consistent five-man cohesion; personnel disruption mid-season typically correlates with increased sack rates and reduced explosive play availability regardless of playcaller competence.
- Report card: Mizzou special teams vs. Texas A&M (opens in a new tab)
More coming. Per-team pages get the full treatment in Phase 3: current rating, season projection histogram, schedule with win probabilities, and live overlays on Pylon stream days. For now, this page exists so stories and news have a permanent home as content rolls in.
Returning production · 2026
66 score
Share of last season's production each unit returns. Higher means more continuity: 70%+ is healthy, 45–70% a normal rebuild, under 45% a major turnover.
Portal additions · 2026
+1.0 rating
20 proven transfers in, carrying the production below from their prior school.
| Player | From | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Ryan HendersonDE From San Diego State | San Diego State | 171 |
| Tawfiq ByardS From Colorado | Colorado | 166 |
| Houston ThomasTE From UTSA | UTSA | 136 |
| Ray ConeyLB From Tulsa | Tulsa | 131 |
| Richie Anderson IIITE From Fresno State | Fresno State | 118 |
| Isaiah HortonWR From Alabama | Alabama | 93 |
Impact scores offensive skill additions (QB/RB/WR/TE) — prior-season production normalized within position (100 ≈ a 90th-percentile producer at that spot) and discounted for non-FBS competition, so a top back counts alongside a top quarterback. Defensive and O-line additions count as transfers but aren't box-score measurable, so they carry no impact score. The rating figure is this class's portal contribution vs. the FBS average, capped at ±2.5.
Situational efficiency · 2025
Percentile is across all FBS teams with play-by-play data for the season. "Late & close" is yards per play in Q4+ with a one-score margin — a proxy for clutch offensive performance.